Anonym (15.1.2004 05:10:01)
Pinging 195.70.151.79 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=254
Reply from 195.70.151.79: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=254
Ping statistics for 195.70.151.79: Packets: Sent = 49, Received = 49, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 16ms, Average = 13ms
Adin (15.1.2004 13:43:18)
No na seznam se taky tezko probijim, ale primej ping je v pohode. zkusil jsem linux.cz:
traceroute to odysseus.linux.cz (147.251.48.205), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 SpeedTouch.lan (10.0.0.138) 0.391 ms 0.361 ms 0.329 ms 2 oakademie.ti.cz (195.70.151.74) 9.484 ms 12.132 ms 9.512 ms 3 phuA08-Se-1-6---5.nextra.cz (213.210.158.1) 13.193 ms 11.387 ms 12.448 ms 4 phnC10-Vl-33.net.nextra.cz (213.210.133.86) 13.688 ms 15.281 ms 12.478 ms 5 nix1-ge.cesnet.cz (194.50.100.191) 13.187 ms 14.315 ms 16.636 ms 6 r43bm-pos9-0-stm16.cesnet.cz (195.113.156.118) 17.155 ms 19.517 ms 14.695 ms 7 c-ics-l.bb.muni.cz (195.178.87.2) 19.827 ms 20.288 ms 18.149 ms 8 ics-c-ics-l.bb.muni.cz (147.251.241.198) 21.301 ms 16.328 ms 15.680 ms 9 ares-242.fi.muni.cz (147.251.242.250) 18.845 ms 15.347 ms 15.414 ms
10 odysseus.fi.muni.cz (147.251.48.205) 18.119 ms 15.070 ms 18.134 ms
Nargon (15.1.2004 16:50:50)
Trasování směrování k www.seznam.cz [212.80.76.3]
s nejvýše 30 přeskoky: 1 14 ms 41 ms 14 ms oakademie.ti.cz [195.70.151.74] 2 27 ms 28 ms 27 ms phuA08-Se-1-6---5.nextra.cz [213.210.158.1] 3 28 ms 41 ms 27 ms phnC10-Vl-33.net.nextra.cz [213.210.133.86] 4 27 ms 41 ms 55 ms nix.tgnet.cz [194.50.100.75] 5 41 ms 28 ms 27 ms l3sw2.tgnet.cz [212.80.65.138] 6 41 ms 27 ms 55 ms seznam--l3sw2.tgnet.cz [212.80.64.18] 7 27 ms 28 ms 27 ms www.seznam.cz [212.80.76.3]
Trasování bylo dokončeno.
no ten vyssi ping u druhyho hopu je moznej z duvodu:
prvni hop je SSG tam je ping v poradku, odpovida asi primo "modem"
u druhyho hopu uz data museli prijit pres SSG a agregaci se zbrzdily.
u tretiho uz sou zbrzdeny agregaci a pokracujou dal ...
P.S. prikladam muj Tracert na seznam
Adsl Nextra 512/128 SSG Praha
Adin (15.1.2004 17:22:12)
To by mne zajimalo jak se potom da vysvetlit ze ja se na SSG dostanu za polovicni dobu nez ty (viz muj prispevek nize).
Mam taktez Adsl Nextra 512/128 Praha
heno (15.1.2004 17:28:26)
Podle posledního testu (15.01.2004 17:11) je rychlost připojení vašeho počítače
DOWN: 92.278 kB/s UP: 13.619 kB/s odezva(min,avg,max): 0.0583s / 0.0661s / 0.0854s
Nargon (15.1.2004 19:36:55)
mno mozna to trochu ovlivni pouzitej modem mam Alcatel Speed Touche home (ten puvodni) ethernet, jen to mam daleko k ustredne po kabelech odhadem tak 6Km
Adin (15.1.2004 23:59:29)
Tak to spis tech 6km, to uz je docela daleko. Ale ja se prekouknul o jeden radek, jsem puvodne bral tech 27ms :-)
Anonym (16.1.2004 00:33:03)
nekdy to kupodivu jede i lip.. 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms SpeedTouch.lan [10.0.0.138] 2 18 ms 28 ms 17 ms 195.70.151.79 3 20 ms 16 ms 16 ms phnA01-Se-1-0---4.nextra.cz [213.210.158.225] 4 22 ms 19 ms 19 ms phnC10-Vl-33.net.nextra.cz [213.210.133.86] 5 20 ms 23 ms 22 ms nix.tgnet.cz [194.50.100.75] 6 22 ms 23 ms 22 ms l3sw2.tgnet.cz [212.80.65.138] 7 42 ms 24 ms 25 ms seznam--l3sw2.tgnet.cz [212.80.64.18] 8 23 ms 25 ms 24 ms www.seznam.cz [212.80.76.3]